The client identified a significant gap in the current LNG simulators available in the market, which were primarily outdated and ineffective in providing realistic, hands-on training experiences for engineers. Most of the existing simulators used older technology and lacked the capabilities to replicate the latest systems and processes used on LNG carriers. As a result, trainees were unable to experience or train for modern-day LNG operational scenarios, which limited the realism and value of their training. This outdated technology failed to keep up with advancements in the LNG industry, leaving engineers unprepared for complex operational challenges in real-world environments.
In addition to being outdated, many of the existing simulators were not user-friendly, making them difficult to operate for both novice and experienced users. The interfaces were often clunky and unintuitive, requiring extensive training just to use the simulator itself. This hindered the learning experience, as engineers spent more time figuring out how to use the system than focusing on developing their technical skills and situational awareness. A simulator that is not easy to navigate reduces the effectiveness of the training, causing frustration and confusion for users, and ultimately compromising the learning outcomes.
The primary issue, however, was the failure of these simulators to cover a broad spectrum of real-time scenarios that engineers and chief engineers encounter while at sea. Realistic training scenarios are critical for developing the decision-making skills required to handle operational complexities. Existing systems did not replicate emergency situations, abnormal operating conditions, or routine maintenance tasks that engineers must manage in real-time. For chief engineers in particular, the lack of exposure to such scenarios posed a serious gap in their preparedness, leaving them unable to practice and refine their response strategies for situations like tank pressure fluctuations, cargo handling errors, or engine failures.
Moreover, the existing simulators did not address the critical aspects of safety management and emergency response, two of the most important responsibilities for engineers at sea. The ability to make quick, informed decisions in emergency situations is vital to prevent accidents or mitigate their effects. With insufficient training tools, engineers lacked the opportunity to practice managing these high-pressure situations effectively. This gap in training not only increased the risk of operational failures but also reduced engineers’ confidence in handling unforeseen challenges. As a result, the overall safety of LNG operations was compromised, and engineers were not equipped to act swiftly and effectively when faced with real-world emergencies.
